Since when is a science major qualified to run a student grant and loan department? How does someone with a degree in music have what it takes to run a community social service and welfare agency? Does a major in art really give one the qualifications to run a business office? I could go on and on with the list but I am sure you get the point.
I have not been successful in finding any actual studies, but in all the different places I've worked (customer service, retail, distribution, purchasing, marketing, and medical to name a few), I have made this observation; most people are working in a career that has little to do with their college major. I know you cannot be shocked by this information.
Generally speaking I don't have a problem with this. I feel that a small part of the downfall of some of corporate America may be due to mismanagement via ignorance. By ignorance I mean that people are hired based on the level of their formal education as opposed to their subject of studies. Many experienced, qualified, and willing workers have been turned down for positions simply because they didn't have a BS or MS degree. This is especially true for non-profit organizations due to grant specifications.
So I ask you, how is a 25 year old Psychology major going to do a better job as a purchasing agent than the 35 year old that lost his 6 year position in purchasing due to downsizing? All this makes me wonder about something. If one doesn't need a degree in Economics to be a purchasing agent, then why do they require a degree at all? I've heard it said to high school graduates many times; "Go to college and get a degree in something. It doesn't matter what, anything will get you a job with better pay". Why doesn't it matter?
I feel the need to clarify that I am not against higher education. I believe people should get as much education as possible, especially when it comes to writing skills, communication skills, and general mathematics. I also believe people should put more thought into their college majors, and don't choose a field of study based on what others think is best, or what will be the quickest and easiest to obtain. Also, I am not faulting a person for seeking a job outside of their career studies. Some choices are based solely on the need for survival. I am just presenting something that has crossed my mind a few times and I wonder if I am the only one that has noticed.
According to this article in
The Wall Street Journal the American worker "... [has] held 10.8 jobs, on average, between ages 18 and 42". No wonder graduates get so far from their original field of study. The way the world changes over the years it is really hard for a person to spend 40 or more years doing the same thing for a living and that is the reason many people evolve into a career gradually over the years and move away from their original field of study. This only proves to me the value of on the job training verses classroom studies.
Who do I see as working closely withing the scope of their college training? Most people that are involved in patient care from reception to physical and/or occupational therapy to doctors of all kinds, accounting positions, information technology positions, and teachers are all usually working within their college major.
In my opinion the bottom line is that people shouldn't be hired based solely on their degree, but in conjunction with work experience, and companies need to reevaluate how they choose someone for a position, and grant distributors need to give non-profits the freedom to choose the best person for the job. And as far as colleges go, maybe the Liberal Arts majors are right to stick to the general things and keep the options open for changes that may come along later on while the world itself changes.